4.3 Article

Time series analysis of jaw muscle contraction and tissue deformation during mastication in miniature pigs

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 7-17

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01156.x

Keywords

electromyography; TMJ capsule; bone strain; mastication; jaw muscles; cross-correlation

Funding

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [DE 11962] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL &CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [R01DE011962] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Masticatory muscle contraction causes both jaw movement and tissue deformation during function. Natural chewing data from 25 adult miniature pigs were studied by means of time series analysis. The data set included simultaneous recordings of electromyography (EMG) from bilateral masseter (MA), zygomaticomandibularis (ZM) and lateral pterygoid muscles, bone surface strains from the left squamosal bone (SQ), condylar neck (CD) and mandibular corpus (MD), and linear deformation of the capsule of the jaw joint measured bilaterally using differential variable reluctance transducers. Pairwise comparisons were examined by calculating the cross-correlation functions. Jaw-adductor muscle activity of MA and ZM was found to be highly cross-correlated with CD and SQ strains and weakly with MD strain. No muscle's activity was strongly linked to capsular deformation of the jaw joint, nor were bone strains and capsular deformation tightly linked. Homologous muscle pairs showed the greatest synchronization of signals, but the signals themselves were not significantly more correlated than those of non-homologous muscle pairs. These results suggested that bone strains and capsular deformation are driven by different mechanical regimes. Muscle contraction and ensuing reaction forces are probably responsible for bone strains, whereas capsular deformation is more likely a product of movement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available