4.0 Article

Indoor and outdoor air concentrations of BTEX and NO2: correlation of repeated measurements

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 807-812

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b405537c

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies on health effects of air pollutants ideally define exposure through the collection of air samples in the participants' homes. Concentrations derived from these samples are then considered as an estimate for the average concentration of air pollutants in the homes. Conclusions drawn from such studies therefore depend very much on the validity of the measured air pollution concentrations. In this paper we analysed repeated BTEX and NO2 measurements with a time period of several months lying between the two conducted home visits. We investigated the variability of their concentrations over time by determining correlation coefficients and calculating within- and between-home variances. Our population consisted of 631 homes of participants from two cohort studies within the framework of the German study on Indoor Factors and Genetics in Asthma. Air pollutants were measured using passive samplers both indoors and outdoors. The measured BTEX concentrations were poorly correlated, with Pearson's correlation coefficient r ranging from -0.19 to 0.27. Additionally, a considerable seasonal effect could be observed. A higher correlation was found for the NO2 concentrations with r ranging between 0.24 and 0.55. For the BTEX, the between-home variance was bigger than the within- home variance, for NO2 both variances were of about the same order. Our results indicate that in a setting of moderate climate like in Germany, the variability of BTEX and NO2 concentrations over time is high and a single measurement is a poor surrogate for the long-term concentrations of these air pollutants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available