4.3 Article

Habitat associations with topography and canopy structure of tree species in a tropical montane forest on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo

Journal

PLANT ECOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 1, Pages 147-161

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:VEGE.0000046059.92806.49

Keywords

crown position; growth rate; Malaysia; spatial distribution; species coexistence; topography

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Habitat associations with topography and canopy structure of 42 abundant tree species were studied in a 2.74-ha plot of tropical montane forest on Mount Kinabalu, Borneo. Many of these species belong to the same higher taxa including eight families and four genera. Analysis of intraspecific spatial distributions for stems greater than or equal to 10 cm diameter revealed that 28 species (including all six species of Fagaceae) showed aggregated distributions at the 100-m(2) and/or 400-m(2) scales, and that 20 species showed habitat associations with topography by torus-translation tests; 17 species showed both characteristics. Species' associations with the local canopy structure were characterized by crown position index (CPI), which was defined relative to neighbour trees. The CPI differed greatly among individual stems at 10-40 cm diameter, and 19 species showed significantly different frequencies of crowns exposed vertically versus those shaded beneath the canopy. Mean growth rates at 10-40 cm diameter and size distributions of species were not related to topographic associations, but were explained by the associations with canopy structure; species with more exposed crowns grew faster and had less positively skewed distributions. Diversity in habitat associations was manifest between two genera (Syzygium and Tristaniopsis) in the family Myrtaceae and among species in these genera, but was less evident in other families and two genera (Garcinia and Lithocarpus).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available