4.3 Article

Calcium release from intracellular stores in rodent astrocytes and neurons in situ

Journal

CELL CALCIUM
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 47-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0143-4160(03)00171-4

Keywords

cyclopiazonic acid; caffeine; endoplasmic reticulum; hippocampal slice; cultured astrocytes; mouse; rat

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Endoplasmic reticular Ca2+ stores, instrumental for intra- and intercellular calcium signalling, can be depleted by different receptor agonists. In the present study, the functional status of ER Ca2+ stores was probed by cyclopiazonic acid (CPA, 10-30 muM, inhibitor of SERCA-dependent ER Ca2+ uptake) and/or caffeine (20 mM, ryanodine receptor activator) in astrocytes and neurons of rat and mouse acute hippocampal brain slices (Stratum radiatum, Stratum moleculare), and in cultured astrocytes, using confocal microscopy and conventional Ca2+ imaging. Astrocytes and neurons in situ, identified by their Ca2+ response in K+-free saline (Dallwig and Deitmer [J. Neurosci. Methods 116 (2002) 77]), had a resting cytosolic Ca2+ level of 105 and 157 nM, respectively (P < 0.05). CPA evoked a Ca2+ transient, which was faster and larger in neurons than in astrocytes, indicating larger Ca2+ leak of neuronal Ca2+ stores. Caffeine evoked a Ca2+ rise in most neurons (>80%), but only in less than 40% of astrocytes. The glial Ca2+ transients in the presence of caffeine had a large and variable delay (>50s), as compared to those in neurons (less than or equal to10s), and appeared to be spontaneous and/or secondary to the neuronal Ca2+ response, leading to release of neuronal transmitters. Astrocytes in culture responded to CPA, but never to caffeine with a Ca2+ rise. Our results indicate that astrocytes, in contrast to neurons, lack caffeine-sensitive Ca2+ stores, and have a relatively smaller leak from CPA-sensitive Ca2+ stores than neurons. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available