4.5 Article

A model of deposition of hygroscopic particles in the human lung

Journal

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 9, Pages 938-947

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/027868290511236

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many aerosols in the environment are hygroscopic and grow in size once inhaled into the humid respiratory tract. The deposited amount and the distribution of the deposited particles among airways differ from insoluble particles of the same initial diameter. As particles grow in size, diffusive behavior tends to diminish while impaction and sedimentation effects increase. A multiple-path model for deposition of hygroscopic particles in the respiratory tract was developed for symmetric and asymmetric lung geometries by implementing particle size change in a model of insoluble particle deposition in lungs. Particle growth by molecular diffusion of water vapor to the particle surface was formulated. The growth model included temperature depression, solute, Kelvin, and Fuchs effects. Particle growth during travel time in each lung airway was computed. Average loss efficiency per airway was calculated by incorporating contributions from particles of various sizes acquired in that airway. A mass balance on the number of particles that entered, exited, deposited, or remained suspended was performed per airway to obtain regional and local deposition fractions of particles in the lung. The deposition fractions calculated for salt particles showed a drop for submicrometer particles in the tracheobronchial region and a significant increase in deposition for micrometer particles or larger. Consequently, very few fine and coarse salt particles reached the alveolar region to be available for deposition. Overall, lung deposition of ultrafine particles decreased for salt particles. Deposition for fine and coarse salt particles in the lung was larger than that of insoluble particles of the same initial particle size

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available