4.4 Article

New fluorescence parameters for the determination of Q(A) redox state and excitation energy fluxes

Journal

PHOTOSYNTHESIS RESEARCH
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages 209-218

Publisher

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/B:PRES.0000015391.99477.0d

Keywords

antenna; chlorophyll a fluorescence; electron transport; fluorimeter; photosynthetic unit; quantum yield

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of useful photosynthetic parameters are commonly derived from saturation pulse-induced fluorescence analysis. We show, that qP, an estimate of the fraction of open centers, is based on a pure 'puddle' antenna model, where each Photosystem (PS) II center possesses its own independent antenna system. This parameter is incompatible with more realistic models of the photosynthetic unit, where reaction centers are connected by shared antenna, that is, the so-called 'lake' or 'connected units' models. We thus introduce a new parameter, qL, based on a Stern-Volmer approach using a lake model, which estimates the fraction of open PS II centers. We suggest that qL should be a useful parameter for terrestrial plants consistent with a high connectivity of PS II units, whereas some marine species with distinct antenna architecture, may require the use of more complex parameters based on intermediate models of the photosynthetic unit. Another useful parameter calculated from fluorescence analysis is phiII, the yield of PS II. In contrast to qL, we show that the phiII parameter can be derived from either a pure 'lake' or pure 'puddle' model, and is thus likely to be a robust parameter. The energy absorbed by PS II is divided between the fraction used in photochemistry, phiII, and that lost non-photochemically. We introduce two additional parameters that can be used to estimate the flux of excitation energy into competing non-photochemical pathways, the yield induced by downregulatory processes, phiNPQ, and the yield for other energy losses, phiNO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available