4.7 Article

Analysis of diversity among 3-chlorobenzoate-degrading strains of Rhodopseudomonas palustris

Journal

MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 68-79

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-003-1028-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM45404] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phenotypic and genetic characteristics of 14 strains of the purple nonsulfur bacterium Rhodopseudomonas palustris were studied to assess diversity within this species. While all strains had certain phenotypic characteristics in common, including the ability to metabolize benzoate and degrade 2- and 3-chlorobenzoate, there were also significant differences among the strains such as the rate of growth in media containing benzoate as a carbon source. Genetic characterization of the strains revealed there were three divergent lineages in the species. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, the 14 strains could be grouped into three distinct clusters (A, B, and C), and this clustering was congruent with that based on gene sequences of form II ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO). Although BOX-PCR genomic DNA fingerprints of all 14 strains exhibited differences, analysis of the fingerprint images and UPGMA/product-moment analysis of similarities showed there were three groupings that were entirely consistent with clusters based on other characteristics of the strains. Thus, regardless of the method of analysis used, strains in groups A and B consistently clustered together and were separate from those of group C. These results suggest that strains in groups A-B and C represent phylogenetically related clones that have diverged from one Another. This indicates that at least three lineages of Rhodopseudomonas palustris exist among the strains included in this study, and that each may be particularly well adapted to a distinct ecological niche.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available