4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

FindEM - a fast, efficient program for automatic selection of particles from electron micrographs

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
Volume 145, Issue 1-2, Pages 91-99

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.11.007

Keywords

particle picking; automatic particle selection; local correlation; electron microscopy; CryoEM

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [P41RR017573] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR17573] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The FindEM particle picking program was tested on the publicly available keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) dataset, and the results were submitted for the bakeoff contest at the recent particle picking workshop (Zhu et al., 2003b). Two alternative ways of using the program are demonstrated and the results are compared. The first of these approximates exhaustive projection matching with a full set of expected views, which need to be known. This could correspond to the task of extending a known structure to higher resolution, for which many 1000's of additional images are required. The second procedure illustrates use of multivariate statistical analysis (MSA) to filter a preliminary set of candidate particles containing a high proportion of false particles. This set was generated using the FindEM program to search with one template that crudely represents the expected views. Classification of the resultant set of candidate particles then allows the desired classes to be selected while the rest can be ignored. This approach requires no prior information of the structure and is suitable for the initial investigation of an unknown structure-the class averages indicate the symmetry and oligomeric state of the particles. Potential improvements in speed and accuracy are discussed. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available