4.7 Article

Geochemical mapping in polluted floodplains using in situ X-ray fluorescence analysis, geophysical imaging, and statistics: Surprising complexity of floodplain pollution hotspot

Journal

CATENA
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages 632-644

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.037

Keywords

Geochemical mapping; Contamination; Electric resistivity tomography; Dipole electromagnetic profiling; Portable X-ray fluorescence; Floodplain

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [15-00340S]
  2. J.E. Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem [IGA 4420415007601]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study is focused on a pollution hotspot in a floodplain impacted by uranium mining in the second half of the 20th century. To image the internal structure of the hotspot, we performed surface gamma activity mapping, in situ X-ray fluorescence spectroscopic analysis (XRF) using a portable instrument and manually obtained sediment cores, and electric resistivity imaging of the shallow subsurface with the help of electric resistivity tomography (ERT) and dipole electromagnetic profiling (DEMP). We used two approaches aimed at deciphering the origin of the pollution hotspot: (i) surface pollution mapping and (ii) identification of the deeper lying lithogenetic units. The description of the floodplain subsurface was supported by optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating. The surface mapping approach was found insufficient to visualise the hotspot and understand its origin. We recognised deposition non-linear in time (or temporally independent) of younger over-bank fines, including mining pollutants over considerably older channel sediments. Our work documents the value of dense geochemical mapping for documentation of fluvial pollution (accessible by portable XRF) as well as the need to understand the structure of the floodplain subsurface (accessible by electric resistivity imaging) and thereby rationalise the hotspot internal structure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available