4.5 Review

Coexistence of HER2 over-expression and p53 protein accumulation is a strong prognostic molecular marker in breast cancer

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages R24-R30

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/bcr738

Keywords

HER2; immunohistochemistry; invasive ductal carcinoma; p53

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Many laboratories are currently evaluating the usefulness of determination of HER2, p53, and Ki67 proliferation indices using immunohistochemical techniques in cancer. Although the available studies suggest that these factors might indeed be helpful in making treatment decisions in cancer patients, their clinical usefulness is still controversial. Methods: Expression of HER2, p53, and Ki67 was examined by immunohistochemistry in samples of breast tissue from 506 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma, obtained between 1981 and 1999 ( median follow up period 82 months), and their significance for prognosis was analyzed. Results: Of the 506 carcinoma tissue samples, 20.1%, 29.0%, and 53.6% were positive for HER2 over- expression, p53 protein accumulation, and Ki67 expression, respectively. Overexpression of HER2 significantly reduced disease free (P = 0.02) and overall survival (P = 0.005). Accumulation of p53 protein significantly decreased disease free ( P = 0.01) and overall survival ( P = 0.01). Patients with tumors that were positive for both HER2 and p53 relapsed and died within a significantly shorter period of time after surgery ( P = 0.0001 and P< 0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, patients with both HER2 and p53 positive tumors had considerably decreased overall survival ( P= 0.04), as did patients with larger tumor size and positive lymph node status. Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate that the coexistence of HER2 over-expression and p53 protein accumulation is a strong prognostic molecular marker in breast cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available