4.7 Article

Comparison of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen contents in inundated and non-inundated zones in southern Quebec, Canada

Journal

CATENA
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2013.09.005

Keywords

Flood zones; Biomass; Soil organic carbon; Soil total nitrogen; Alluvial soil; Climate change

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil organic carbon (SOC) and soil total nitrogen (STN) play a key role in pedogenic processes and contribute to soil fertility. In flood zones, little is known about the processes associated with the development of alluvial soils subject to frequent flooding, in particular with respect to the accumulation of biomass on the ground, concentrations of SOC and soil nitrogen. In this case study, a paired-site approach (inundated and non-inundated zones) was used to determine the concentration of SOC and STN, and other soil properties (pH, CEC, texture) in alluvial soils in riparian areas located in the middle section of the Saint-Francois River (southern Quebec, Canada). The results show that alluvial soils subject to frequent flooding (FFz: 0-20 year recurrence) are less rich in SOC and SIN than soils outside the flood zones (NFz). The average rates obtained for surface horizons (0-20 cm depth) range from 2.0 +/- 1.1% to 4.0 +/- 4.1% (SOC) and from 0.2 +/- 0.1% to 0.3 +/- 0.2% (STN) for soils in flood zones (FFz) and those in non-flood zones (NFz). The comparison of the mean soil data from the various flood zones obtained with the Mann-Whitney U test largely confirms the differences observed between SOC and SIN concentrations. The absence or virtual absence of litter in frequently flooded areas contributes to decreasing the input of organic matter in the surface horizons and progressively reduces SOC concentrations. Over time, this may alter pedogenic processes and reduce soil fertility, and, as a result, impact forest regeneration, among other aspects. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available