4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of the precipitation agents and rare earth additives on the structure and catalytic performance in glycerol hydrogenolysis of Cu/SiO2 catalysts prepared by precipitation-gel method

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages 223-232

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.02.037

Keywords

Glycerol hydrogenolysis; 1,2-Propanediol; Cu/SiO2 catalyst; Precipitation agent; Rare earth additive

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21133011, 21203221]
  2. Science and Technology Support Program of Gansu Province, China [1304FKCA113]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of the precipitation agents (NaOH, Na2CO3, NH4OH and NH4HCO3) and rare earth additives (La, Ce, Y, Pr and Sm) were studied on the structure and catalytic performance in glycerol hydrogenolysis of the Cu/SiO2 catalysts prepared by precipitation-gel method. The physical chemical properties of the catalysts were characterized by means of FTIR, H-2-TPR, N2O chemisorption, XRD, XPS, BET and TEM. The results showed that precipitation agents had obvious effects on the phase structure, reduction property and catalytic performances (activity, selectivity and stability) of the catalysts. The Cu/SiO2 catalyst precipitated with NaOH presented the highest activity and stability than those with other precipitants, most likely due to its more even dispersion of Cu particles, higher resistant to sintering during glycerol reaction. The incorporation of rare earth additives to Cut SiO2 catalyst could promote the structural stability and inhibit the sintering and leaching of the catalysts, especially noticeable for Y and La, and thus contribute to the long-term stability of the catalysts. Clearly, this study provides directions for the design of more efficient and stable Cu catalysts toward the industrial application of glycerol hydrogenolysis. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available