4.5 Article

Vision in avian emberizid foragers: maximizing both binocular vision and fronto-lateral visual acuity

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 218, Issue 9, Pages 1347-1358

Publisher

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.108613

Keywords

Birds; Visual acuity; Visual fields

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [1146986]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1146986] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Avian species vary in their visual system configuration, but previous studies have often compared single visual traits between two to three distantly relatedspecies. However, birds use different visual dimensions that cannot be maximized simultaneously to meet different perceptual demands, potentially leading to trade-offs between visual traits. We studied the degree of inter-specific variation in multiple visual traits related to foraging and anti-predator behaviors in nine species of closely related emberizid sparrows, controlling for phylogenetic effects. Emberizid sparrows maximize binocular vision, even seeing their bill tips in someeye positions, whichmayenhance the detection of prey and facilitate food handling. Sparrows have a single retinal center of acute vision (i.e. fovea) projecting fronto-laterally (but not into the binocular field). The foveal projection close to the edge of the binocular field may shorten the time to gather and process both monocular and binocular visual information from the foraging substrate. Contrary to previous work, we found that species with larger visual fields had higher visual acuity, which may compensate for larger blind spots (i.e. pectens) above the center of acute vision, enhancing predator detection. Finally, species with a steeper change in ganglion cell density across the retina had higher eye movement amplitude, probably due to a more pronounced reduction in visual resolution away from the fovea, which would need to be moved around more frequently. The visual configuration of emberizid passive prey foragers is substantially different from that of previously studied avian groups (e.g. sit-and-wait and tactile foragers).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available