4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3 over metal oxide and zeolite catalysts-A review

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 175, Issue 1, Pages 147-156

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.03.034

Keywords

SCR of NOx with ammonia; Metal oxide catalysts; MnO2; Cu, Fe-exchanged zeolites; Fe-beta; Reaction mechanism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Fund of China [51078203]
  2. National High Science & Technology Project (863) [2009AA06Z301, 2010AA065002]
  3. Ford Motor Company

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The removal of NOx by catalytic technology at low temperatures (100-300 degrees C) is significant for flue gas of industry and exhaust gas of diesel engine; however, to develop the low-temperature catalyst (LTC) for selective catalytic reduction of NOx with ammonia (NH3-SCR) is still a challenge especially at temperature below 200 degrees C. This study reviews two types of LTC, the metal oxide catalyst and metal exchanged zeolite catalyst. The performances of Mn-based metal oxide with and without supports have been attempted to correlate with preparation method, precursor, and various supports. The role of manganese oxides with different phases as the most effective low temperature active component and the limitation of stability in the presence of H2O and SO2 are discussed. Fe, Cu exchanged zeolites as potential real application catalysts in diesel engine have been investigated for NH3-SCR of NOx in the past decades, the activity, selectivity and thermal stability related to types of metal, and zeolite, and reaction conditions are reviewed. The research progress in active sites and reaction mechanisms of Mn-based catalyst and Fe-zeolite catalysts are described and compared. Finally, future research directions in the developing LTC for removal of NOx are proposed. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available