4.7 Article

A comparative study of diffusion of benzene/p-xylene mixtures in MFI particles, pellets and grown membranes

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 168, Issue 1, Pages 147-157

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2011.01.037

Keywords

ZSM-5; Silicalite-1 membranes; Aromatic molecules; Knudsen diffusion; Stefan-Maxwell diffusion; Wicke-Kallenbach experiments; Pressure modulation frequency response

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education, Saudi Arabia of the Center of Research Excellence in Petroleum Refining and Petrochemicals at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM)
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG [JE260-8/1]
  3. Fonds der chemischen Industrie

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The transport and separation of mixtures between benzene and p-xylene in pellets prepared by pressing of ZSM-5 powder and a dense supported (crystalline) Silicalite-1 membrane were compared to isolated ZSM-5 crystallites. The kinetics of the transport in the pressed pellet and the grown membrane determined in a Wicke-Kallenbach cell (313-403 K; partial pressure range 200-2300 Pa) differed significantly from those measured for isolated ZSM-5 particles with the pressure modulation frequency response technique (343-403 K; partial pressure 30 Pa). In a pressed pellet, the transport was of Knudsen type leading to high fluxes of 10(-4) mol/m(2) s and identical permeances for benzene and p-xylene. The diffusion coefficient in a pressed pellet exceeded that in particles, in which the transport was controlled by intracrystalline diffusion and the pore entrance step, by 8 orders of magnitude. The flux across a grown Silicalite-1 membrane was two orders of magnitude lower and the permeability of p-xylene was 2.6-5 times higher than that of benzene. The change in diffusivity in the membrane compared to the particles results from the higher surface coverage of p-xylene. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available