4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

TAP study on the active oxygen species in the total oxidation of propane over a CuO-CeO2/γ-Al2O3 catalyst

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 157, Issue 1-4, Pages 49-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2010.02.048

Keywords

Active oxygen species; Propane oxidation; TAP; (Reverse) spillover

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The activation of propane both in the absence and presence of gas-phase O-2 or CO2 over a CuO-CeO2/gamma-Al2O3 catalyst is investigated in a TAP reactor between 623 and 873 K Two different types of oxygen species are involved dependent on the mixture introduced (1) lattice oxygen from the surface and bulk of the catalyst and (2) weakly adsorbed oxygen species produced either from gas-phase O-2 or CO2 Both types of oxygen species participate in the total oxidation of propane If pulses of pure propane are admitted lattice oxygen from CuO and CeO2 is consumed reducing these oxides to a certain extent Apart from surface lattice oxygen from CuO and CeO2 also bulk lattice oxygen is involved in the activation of propane demonstrating the high O mobility within the lattice of these metal oxides Lattice oxygen of alumina is not available for reaction with propane Introduction of O-2 reoxidizes the reduced sites on CuO and CeO2 as expected for a Mars-van Krevelen mechanism Also CO2 can replenish O vacancies in the active phase by dissociative adsorption on alumina and ceria The adsorption on alumina is followed by reverse spillover of reactive O species to the active phase The second type of oxygen consists of weakly adsorbed oxygen species produced either from O-2 on both CuO and CeO2 or from CO2 on CeO2 and enhances strongly the catalytic activity In the presence of both O-2 and CO2 in the propane feed the predominant reaction pathways will only involve the two types of active species produced from O-2 and not from CO2 (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available