4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Performance of La1-xCexFe0.7Ni0.3O3 perovskite catalysts for methane steam reforming

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 146, Issue 1-2, Pages 148-153

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2009.02.023

Keywords

Perovskite; Calcination temperature; Ce-substitution; Steam reforming; Hydrogen; Methane

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [과C6A1903] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

La1-xCexFe0.3O3 perovskite catalysts, denoted as LCFN-x (0.1 <= x <= 0.5), were prepared using a Pechini method. The effects of Ce-substitution and calcination temperature on the structure and performance of the prepared catalysts during the steam reforming of methane (SRM) were investigated. The XRD patterns of these catalysts indicated that a well-crystallized perovskite structure was formed when LFN and LCFN were calcined at temperatures higher than 500 and 600 degrees C, respectively. For the reaction system investigated in this study, the most suitable calcination temperature was 700 degrees C. The 700 degrees C-calcined catalysts, denoted as LFN-700 and LCFN-700, exhibited the highest methane conversion among catalysts of the same type, due to their relatively large surface area and small crystallite size compared with those of perovskite catalysts. The catalytic activity increased with the amounts of added Ce, up to x = 0.2-0.3, but decreased significantly when x >= 0.5. In particular, LCFN-0.2 exhibited a higher hydrogen yield and slower deactivation rates than those exhibited by a commercial catalyst at the steam/carbon ratio of 1. This result was obtained because coke deposition was retarded to a greater extent on LCFN-0.2 than on the commercial catalyst under the selected reaction conditions. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available