Journal
CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 24-31Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.07.002
Keywords
nickel; tungsten; unsupported catalyst; hydrotreating; thiosalt; XPS
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Three solution synthesis routes for the preparation of unsupported Ni-W-S hydrotreating catalysts were compared. In all of them WO(2)S(2)(2-)core was applied as precursor, but the reaction between Ni and W species was done in different ways. The preparation methods included solution reaction between WO2S22- and nickel species in the presence of organic surfactant (liquid-liquid route), reaction of amorphous high surface area nickel compound with aqueous WO2S22- species (liquid-solid route) and reaction of amorphous WOS2 solid with aqueous solution of nickel salt (solid-liquid route). The catalysts were characterized by several techniques including X-ray powder diffraction, specific surface area and pore volume measurements, transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The catalytic activities were evaluated in thiophene hydrodesulfurization (HDS), toluene hydrogenation (HYD) and pyridine hydrodenitrogenation (HDN) reactions. It has been shown that highly active unsupported sulfides can be obtained from three routes. The highest weight activity was observed for the most finely dispersed liquid-liquid preparation. However, the relation between catalytic activity and texture is not linear and the preparation having low surface area and containing NiS bulky particles covered by curved WS2 slabs showed the highest activity per unit of surface area. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available