4.2 Article

Global expression profiling of strains harbouring null mutations reveals that the five rpf-like genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis show functional redundancy

Journal

TUBERCULOSIS
Volume 84, Issue 3-4, Pages 167-179

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2003.12.004

Keywords

Rpf; Mycobacterium; resuscitation; dormancy; tuberculosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Setting: Aged, dormant cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis can be resuscitated by a secreted, proteinaceous growth factor from Micrococcus luteus, known as resuscitation-promoting factor (Rpf). M. tuberculosis contains five rpf-tike genes, rpfA (Rv0867c), rpfB (Rv1009), rpfC (Rv1884c), rpfD (Rv2389c) and rpfE (Rv2450c), that bear significant similarity to Mi. luteus rpf, suggesting that these too may play a role in growth and/or reactivation from a quiescent state. Objective and design: Unmarked deletion mutants of each of the five rpf-tike genes of M. tuberculosis H37Rv were constructed and their phenotypes and global gene expression profiles were assessed. Results and conclusions: Deletion of any one of the rpf-like genes did not affect growth or survival of M. tuberculosis in liquid culture, but some alterations in colony-forming ability and colonial morphology were observed. Global gene expression profiting suggested that loss of rpfC affected the expression of the largest number of genes and there was a significant overlap in the differential gene expression profile of the rpfC mutant with those of the rpfB, rpfD and rpfE mutants. The expression profile of the rpfA mutant was notably less similar, but inverse associations with genes affected in the other mutants were observed. These results, together with those obtained by real-time, quantitative RT-PCR, suggest that the rpf-tike genes serve wholly or partially overlapping functions in M. tuberculosis. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available