4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Hydrogen production from biomass-derived oil over monolithic Pt- and Rh-based catalysts using steam reforming and sequential cracking processes

Journal

CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages 565-573

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2007.12.062

Keywords

hydrogen production; biomass valorization; pyrolysis bio-oil; catalytic steam reforming; noble metal; ceria-zirconia; monolith

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The conversion of biomass-derived crude oil towards H-2 production was investigated using continuous catalytic steam reforming and sequential cracking/reforming processes. The performances of Pt/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 and Rh/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 catalysts deposited on cordierite monoliths were comparatively studied. The Pt-based catalyst showed better catalytic activity than Rh for steam reforming in the whole range of steam-to-carbon molar ratios (S/C) studied, the amount of added water determining the H-2 yield for both noble metals. The best H-2 yield (70%, corresponding to similar to 49 mmol of H-2/g of bio-oil) was obtained with the Pt catalyst at S/C ratio of 10 at 780 degrees C, with CH4 concentrations below 1%. In the case of sequential cracking, the process alternated cracking steps, during which the bio-oil is converted into H-2, CO, CO2, CH4 and carbon stored on the catalyst, with regeneration steps where the deposited coke was burnt under O-2. Comparison with thermal bio-oil cracking showed that the catalyst plays a major role in enhancing the H-2 productivity up to 18 mmol of H-2/g of bio-oil (similar to 50% of H-2 in gaseous products stream) and lowering the CH4 formation. The steam reforming offers high yields towards H-2 but is highly endothermic, whereas the sequential cracking, despite lower H-2 yields, offers a better control of coke formation and catalyst stability, and due to lower energy input can theoretically run auto-thermally. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available