4.4 Review

Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review

Journal

PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 322-338

Publisher

LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_1

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intimates typically are positively biased in their relationship evaluations. Given this fact, how can intimates regulate their esteem needs about their relationships and still function effectively, without risking later regret and disappointment? We address this issue by first reviewing work showing that because bias and accuracy are independent, they can co-exist. We next show how bias and accuracy are subject to different evaluative motives, relationship evaluations, and situations. It is argued that the pursuit of important goals is a time when people are motivated to feel good about their relationships. This is a time when relationship judgements arepositively biased and relatively inaccurate. However important choice points in the relationship are times when people are motivated to both accurately understand their relationships and to feel good about their relationships. These dual needs can be simultaneously met by becoming more accurate in epistemic- related relationship judgments while being more positively biased in esteem-related relationship judgments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available