4.8 Review

Phase stability and phase transformations in Pu-Ga alloys

Journal

PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE
Volume 49, Issue 3-4, Pages 429-485

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6425(03)00032-X

Keywords

plutonium; Pu-Ga alloys; phase stability; phase transformations; electronic structure; instability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plutonium is of interest because of its nuclear properties. However, it is its electronic structure and the resulting physical and chemical properties that make plutonium the most complex element in the periodic table. It exhibits six solid allotropes at ambient pressure and is notoriously unstable with temperature, pressure, chemical additions, and time. It undergoes virtually every type of phase transformation known. The addition of a few atomic percent gallium helps retain the face-centered cubic delta-phase to room temperature, avoiding transformation to a monoclinic phase with a huge volume contraction. We present previously unpublished experimental studies on phase stability and phase transformations in Pu-Ga alloys and compare these to available literature. However, we first review the physics of plutonium and the fee delta-phase to help us understand why plutonium defies conventional metallurgical wisdom. Plutonium sits near the middle of the actinide series, which marks the emergence of 5f electrons in the valence shell. Right at plutonium the 5f electrons are caught in an abrupt transition between being bonding and being localized (chemically inert). In fact, in the delta-phase they appear to be in a unique state of being neither fully bonding nor localized, which leads to novel electronic interactions and physical behavior. We compare these interactions to two other unstable elements in the periodic table, namely iron and cerium, to get a better appreciation of peculiarities of plutonium. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available