Journal
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 2-11Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0165551504041673
Keywords
peer review; refereeing; reliability; journal review system; science management; knowledge management
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper analyses the reliability of the double-blind peer review systems used for submissions to the 2001 and 2002 UK Academy for Information Systems (UKAIS) conferences. The level of reliability found in the first conference was marginally lower than would be expected from a model based on chance. in the second conference the reliability level was significantly better, but still low. The paper explores some of the implications of this for the reviewing system, and suggests a model for assessing the impact of low levels of reliability.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available