4.6 Article

Electron Paramagnetic Resonance investigation of the nature of active species involved in carbon black oxidation on ZrO2 and Cu/ZrO2 catalysts

Journal

CATALYSIS COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 17, Issue -, Pages 64-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2011.10.016

Keywords

ZrO2; Copper oxide; Reactivity; Carbon black oxidation; Electron Paramagnetic Resonance

Funding

  1. Region Nord Pas-de-Calais
  2. European Community (ERDF)
  3. University of Littoral-Cote d'Opale
  4. Agence Universitaire de la Francophonie (AUF)-Region Moyen-Orient
  5. Lebanese National Council for Scientific Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To identify the nature of active paramagnetic species involved in the carbon black (CB) oxidation, an Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) study of (CB-ZrO2) and (CB-Cu/ZrO2) loose contact mixtures treated under argon flow has been undertaken. In the presence of pure zirconia catalysts, it was found that ZrO2 interacts with CB and can be reduced into Zr3+ formed in tetragonal phase of this oxide support. In parallel, several EPR signals assigned to carbonaceous radicals were detected: i) carbonaceous radicals on CB surface, ii) radicals located at the CB-ZrO2 interface and iii) oxygen deficit carbonaceous radicals observed at high treatment temperature. The carbonaceous signals disappeared completely after CB oxidation in agreement with a regeneration of the catalyst treated under air. For copper supported on zirconia catalysts, oxygen surrounding isolated Cu(II) species and oxygen from tetragonal ZrO2 lattice are involved in carbon black oxidation. The phenomenon is reversible and this catalyst is also regenerated by air. Carbonaceous radical signals were also observed for (CB-Cu/ZrO2) mixture and their intensity decrease versus temperature appeared in good agreement with the better activity of Cu/ZrO2 compared to pure ZrO2. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available