4.8 Article

Preparation and characterization of starch/cyclodextrin bioadhesive microspheres as platform for nasal administration of Gabexate Mesylate (Foy (R)) in allergic rhinitis treatment

Journal

BIOMATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 159-170

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00477-0

Keywords

starch/cyclodextrins; microspheres; Gabexate Mesylate; inclusion complexes; nasal delivery system

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioadhesive and biodegradable microspheres were obtained by chemical cross-linking with epichlorohydrin of an alkaline solution of a mixture of starch and alpha-, beta-, or gamma-cyclodextrin (CyD). Microspheres were characterized by scanning electron microscopy, swelling degree, and water retention. The percentage of the effective CyD in microspheres was estimated by measuring the amount of iodine and typical organic compounds (TOCs) retained in the hydrophobic cavity of CyD. Gabexate Mesylate (trade name Foy(R); GM), an antiallergic drug, was included in microspheres by soaking in an aqueous solution containing the drug, followed by solvent evaporation or lyophilization. UV, IR, and DSC data indicated that despite the fact that GM is a hydrophilic drug, its hydrophobic moiety close to the benzene ring is able to penetrate the CyD cavity and to form stable inclusion complexes. Values of the association equilibrium constant for GM binding to CyD, obtained by UV differential spectroscopy, indicated that the affinity of the drug for alpha- and gamma-CyD is higher than that for beta-CyD. In vitro, GM was gradually released during 1 h. Even if the release rate of the drug is relatively fast, the microspheres might actually provide the best platform since the material adheres to the nasal mucosa which was proved by adhesion tests. The GM integrity was checked by comparing its anti-trypsin activity before and after release. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available