4.5 Article

Expression of an inwardly rectifying K+ channel, Kir5.1, in specific types of fibrocytes in the cochlear lateral wall suggests its functional importance in the establishment of endocochlear potential

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages 76-84

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03092.x

Keywords

cochlear K+ circulation; development; endolymph; fibrocytes; spiral ligament

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cochlear endolymph contains 150 mm K+ and has a highly positive potential of approximate to+80 mV. The specialized ionic composition and high potential in endolymph are essential for hearing and maintained by circulation of K+ from perilymph to endolymph through the cochlear lateral wall. Various types of K+ channel such as Kir4.1 and KCNQ1/KCNE1 are expressed in stria vascularis of the lateral wall and play essential roles in K+ circulation. In this study, we examined a distribution of another K+ channel, Kir5.1, and found it specifically expressed in the spiral ligament of the cochlear lateral wall. Specific immunoreactivity for Kir5.1 was detected in type II, IV and V fibrocytes of the ligament and spiral limbus, all of which are directly involved in K+ circulation. Kir5.1 was not found in either type I or III fibrocytes. Although Kir5.1 assembles with Kir4.1 to form a functional Kir channel in renal epithelia and retinal Muller cells, double-immunolabelling revealed that they were expressed in distinct regions in the cochlea lateral wall, i.e. Kir4.1 only in stria vascularis vs. Kir5.1 in spiral ligament. During development, the expression of Kir5.1 subunits started significantly later than Kir4.1 and was correlated with the 'rapid' phase of the elevation of endocochlear potential (EP). Kir5.1 and Kir4.1 channel-subunits may therefore play distinct functional roles in K+ circulation in the cochlear lateral wall.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available