4.5 Article

Role of glutamate receptors in nucleus accumbens core and shell in spatial behaviour of rats

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 128, Issue 2, Pages 229-238

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.06.041

Keywords

NMDA; AP-5; DNQX; kynurenic acid; working memory; reference memory; radial maze

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nucleus accumbens (NAC) is considered to be an important neural interface between corticolimbic and motor systems of the brain. Several studies have shown that the NAC is not only involved in motivation and reward-related processes but also in spatial behavior. We here investigated the involvement of different glutamate receptor subclasses within NAC core and shell subregions on behavior in a radial-maze. Rats were first trained in a four-arm-baited eight-arm radial maze task for baseline performance. Thereafter, the effects of microinjection of the nonselective glutamate receptor antagonist kynurenic acid (4.5 mug), the NMDA receptor antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (11 mug) and the non-NMDA receptor antagonist 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (0.75 mug) in NAC core and shell were tested on reference memory errors (RME) and working memory errors (WME). Moreover, the choice pattern of entries and duration of arm-entries were evaluated. Microinjection of all drugs increased RME. Additionally, non-NMDA receptor blockade in NAC shell but not core increased WME. After microinjection of all drugs into NAC core and shell rats preferentially choose the arms next to the previously visited arm. This work shows that glutamate receptors in both NAC subregions are important for spatial behavior. The deficits seen after glutamate receptor blockade may not be working- or reference memory-related but caused by a switch from a memory-dependent allocentric strategy to an egocentric response strategy. (C) 2004 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available