4.4 Article

Ab initio study of benzene adsorption on the Cu(110) surface and simulation of STM images

Journal

SURFACE SCIENCE
Volume 548, Issue 1-3, Pages 29-40

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2003.11.026

Keywords

ab initio quantum chemical methods and calculations; density functional calculations; scanning tunneling microscopy; physical adsorption; copper; aromatics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The adsorption of benzene molecules onto the Cu(110) surface has been studied using a crystalline linear combination of atomic orbitals approximation (LCAO). Adsorption energetics have been modelled at both the Hartree-Fock (HF) and density functional theory (DFT) level, and scanning tunneling microscope (STM) images generated for the preferred adsorption geometry. The calculated binding energies are strongly dependent upon basis set superposition errors (BSSE). As expected HF provides a relatively poor description of this loosely bound system, and is found to be unbound when BSSE is taken into account. Inclusion of electron correlation through DFT methods gives an optimised binding energy of 106 kJ mol(-1) with the benzene molecule occupying a bridging site between the rows of surface copper atoms and an adsorption height of approximately 2 Angstrom. This figure takes account of relaxation of benzene upon adsorption with the hydrogen atoms tilting away from the surface. Our predicted energetics compare favourably with previous theoretical studies using cluster methods and experimental binding energies determined from temperature programmed desorption (TPD). We have also simulated scanning tunneling microscope (STM) images using the Tersoff and Hamann method and compare our results with recent experimental measurements. Our simulation suggests the experimental image results from a benzene dimer rather than an isolated molecule. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available