4.4 Article

Negative ion graphitised carbon nano-liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry increases sensitivity for glycoprotein oligosaccharide analysis

Journal

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages 2282-2292

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1626

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Negative ion nano-liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (nano-LC/MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (nano-LC/MS2), using graphitised carbon as separating medium, were explored for analysing neutral and acidic O-linked and N-linked oligosaccharide alditols. Compared to the sensitivity of capillary LC/MS (flow rate of 6 muL/min) coupled with a conventional electrospray ionisation source, the nano-LC/MS (flow rate of 0.6 muL/min) with a nanoflow ion source was shown to increase the sensitivity ten-fold with a detection limit in the low-femtomole range. The absolute signals for the [M-nH](n-) ions of the oligosaccharides were increased 100-fold, enabling accumulation of high-quality fragmentation data in MS2 mode, in which detection of low abundant sequence ions is necessary for characterisation of highly sialylated N-linked oligosaccharides. Oligosaccharides with high numbers of sialic acid residues gave dominant fragments arising from the loss of sialic acid, and less abundant fragments from cleavage of other glycosidic bonds. Enzymatic offline desialylation of oligosaccharides in the low-femtomole range prior to MS2 analysis was shown to increase the quality of the spectra. Automated glycofragment mass fingerprinting using the GlycosidIQ software confirmed the oligosaccharide sequence for both neutral desialylated as well as sialylated structures. Furthermore, the use of graphitised carbon nano-LC/MS enabled the detection of four sialylated O-linked oligosaccharides on membrane proteins from ovarian tissue (5 mug of total amount of protein). Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available