Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer

Objective. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients treated by laparoscopico-vaginal (modified) radical hysterectomy (LVMRH) to those of patients treated by abdominal radical hysterectomy (RH). Methods. From 1997 to 2002, we performed 37 cases of LVMRH + pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and 47 cases of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy (LVRH) with paraaortic lymph node sampling + PLND. Inclusion criteria for the laparoscopic surgery were patients with FIGO stage IA1 to IB1, for exocervical mass of grossly less than 2 cm. As a control, we selected 46 cases for MRH group and 96 cases for RH group. Results. Operating time, the number of lymph nodes obtained and the rate of complications were similar in both groups. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in laparoscopic group. Four (8.5%) of 47 LVRH patients and 2 (2.1%) of 96 RH patients had recurrences. Recurrence-free survival in RH group was significantly higher than LVRH group (P = 0.0194). In LVRH group, patients with large tumor volume (greater than or equal to4.2 cm(3)) had significantly higher recurrence rate of 42.9% (3/7) than those with small volume (1/40) (P = 0.0021). The 3-year progression-free survivals were 97.1% in LVRH group (<4.2 cm(3)) and 98.9% in RH group. Conclusion. Laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of early cervical cancer is a safe and effective alternative to conventional RH. Considering the higher recurrence rate in patients with large tumor volume, it would be better if laparoscopic surgery is limited to patients with small volume disease (tumor diameter <2 cm or volume <4.2 cm(3)). (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.