4.5 Article

Ionic conductivity of composite electrolytes based on oligo(ethylene oxide) and fumed oxides

Journal

SOLID STATE IONICS
Volume 166, Issue 3-4, Pages 275-293

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2003.11.017

Keywords

fumed oxides; ionic conductivity; composite electrolytes; oligo(ethylene oxide); rechargeable lithium batteries

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effects of fumed oxide fillers (SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2) and binary mixtures of oxide fillers (SiO2/Al2O3) on ionic conductivity of composite electrolytes based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) oligomers (M-w = 250, 500, 1000, and 2000) + lithium bis(trifluromethylsulfonyl)imide [LiN(CF3SO2)(2)] (LiTFSI) (Li/O = 1:20) are studied using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in the attenuated total reflectance mode (FTIR-ATR). Fillers show similar effect on conductivity in all systems: no distinguishable effect is found with filler type, and addition of filler decreases conductivity at temperatures above the melting point but increases conductivity at temperatures below. The addition of fillers stiffens polymer segments, as evidenced by enhancement in Li+-polymer interactions above the melting point seen in the IR spectra and an increase in T-g found from the DSC analysis. No reduction in ion-pairing upon addition of filler is observed from the IR spectra. The increase in conductivity at temperatures below the melting point is believed to be due to faster ion transport along the filler surface rather than through enhanced mobility of polymer segments. The insulating nature of fillers and stiffening of the polymer solvent in the presence of fillers cause a decrease in conductivity at temperatures above the melting point and is correlated solely with volume fraction of the filler. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available