4.5 Article

Site within N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor pore modulates channel Gating

Journal

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 157-164

Publisher

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.65.1.157

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

N-methyl-D-aspartate-type glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are ligand-gated ion channels activated by coagonists glutamate and glycine. NMDARs play a critical role in synaptic plasticity and excitotoxicity, largely because of their high calcium permeability and slow deactivation and desensitization kinetics. NR1 is an obligate subunit in all NMDAR complexes, where it combines with NR2A, 2B, 2C, and/or 2D. NR1 binds glycine, and residue Asn598 in the re-entrant membrane loop M2 largely determines NMDAR calcium permeability. In contrast, NR2 subunits bind glutamate and contain regions that regulate receptor desensitization and deactivation. Here, we report that mutations of NR1(Asn598) in combination with wild-type NR2A, expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, exhibit altered glycine-independent desensitization. In the absence of extracellular calcium, substitution of Arg for Asn598 (NR1R) slowed desensitization by 2- to 3-fold compared with wild-type NR1/NR2A, and glutamate-evoked peak current EC50 and deactivation rate were also affected. Replacement of Asn by Gln (NR1Q) produced two distinct rates of calcium- and glycine-independent desensitization. Moreover, in the presence of extracellular calcium, the voltage-dependent pore block by calcium for the NR1Q mutant mimicked the effects of the positively charged Arg at this site in NR1R on slowing desensitization and deactivation. A kinetic model of the NMDA receptor-channel suggests that these results can be explained by altered gating and not ligand binding. Our data increase understanding of the role that amino acids within the NMDAR pore play in channel gating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available