4.4 Article

Repetitive Er : YAG laser irradiation of human skin: A histological evaluation

Journal

LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 146-151

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20080

Keywords

collagen denaturation; collagen remodeling; myofibroblast; non-ablative laser skin resurfacing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Objective: Deep coagulation of skin collagen by Er:YAG laser repetitive pulses has been predicted by previous theoretical models and later demonstrated on animal skin. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of repetitive Er:YAG laser pulses on human skin and its response to this treatment. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Lid skin of six female volunteers with blepharochalasis has been treated with laser at day 0, 7, and 21 before elective surgery-blepharoplasty. The treated skin was excised as part of the procedure and prepared for further histological examination. We used a 2,940 nm Er:YAG laser (Fidelis M320A by Fotona) with 'smooth' mode parameters: fluence from 0.50 to 2.00 J/cm(2); six pulses per packet; 550 musecond/pulse, 250 millisecond/packet; single pass, no overlapping; spot size 5 mm; repetition rate 20 Hz. Results: We observed deep collagen denaturation at laser fluences of 1.25 J/cm2 and over; epidermal damage was proportional to fluence with total coagulation of the epidermal layer at fluences of 1.75 J/cm(2) and over. At day 7 after laser treatment we observed a complete regeneration of the epidermal layer and a regeneration zone within the dermis with prominent infiltration of CD68+ monocytes/macrophages. At day 21 after laser treatment we observed collagen remodeling and (myo-)fibroblast proliferation at tissue depths of up to 240 mum. Conclusions: Repetitive Er:YAG laser irradiation is effective in deep denaturation and remodeling of human skin collagen in vivo, with less epidermal damage compared to standard Er:YAG laser skin resurfacing. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available