4.5 Review

Structural basis and therapeutic implication of the interaction of CCN proteins with glycoconjugates

Journal

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
Volume 10, Issue 31, Pages 3913-3928

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1381612043382567

Keywords

CCN proteins; proteoglycan; glycosaminoglycan; TSR; heparin binding; cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The CCN family of growth factors is composed of six structurally related proteins including the cysteirie-rich 61 (Cyr61), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), nephroblastoma overexpressed (NOV), Wnt-l induced secreted protein-1 (WISP-1). WISP-2 and WISP-3. Each family member consists of four conserved cysteine rich modular domains with sequence similarity to the insulin like growth factor binding proteins, von Willebrand factor, thrombospondin repeat and the growth factors cysteine knot. The CCN proteins demonstrate a wide variety of biological activities regulating cell adhesion, proliferation, survival, migration, invasion in vitro and tumorigenesis and angiogenesis in vivo. Both cancer promoting and inhibiting roles were proposed for several CCN proteins suggesting that contextual factors could regulate their activities. Consistent with this hypothesis, structural and experimental evidence indicate that the function of these proteins is modulated by their interaction with sulfated glycosaminoglycans. Because the CCN proteins are implicated ill the turnorigenic process, they are potential targets for the development of cancer therapeutics. Modulation of their glycosaminoglycan interaction by exogenous, highly sulfated polysaccharides, oligosaccharides or glycosarninoglycan mimetics could prevent their participation in cancer progression. Understanding the structural requirements for their polysaccharide interaction should provide important information to generate glycosaminoglycan-based cancer therapeutics targeting the CCN family of proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available