4.7 Review

Protective ischaemia in patients: preconditioning and postconditioning

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 234-246

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvp129

Keywords

Preconditioning; Postconditioning; Infarct size; Myocardial protection; Coronary intervention; Cardiac surgery

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [2 RO1 HL60849-09, 1R01 HL 092141-01]
  2. Danish Cardiovascular Research Academy
  3. Carlyle Fraser Heart Center of Emory University Hospital Midtown

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Infarct size can be limited by reducing the determinants of infarct size or increasing collateral blood flow by treatment initiated before the ischaemic event. Reperfusion is the definitive treatment for permanently reducing infarct size and restoring some degree of contractile function to the affected myocardium. Innate survival mechanisms in the heart can be stimulated by short, non-lethal periods of ischaemia and reperfusion, applied either before or after the ischaemic event. Preconditioning, a series of transient intervals of ischaemia and reperfusion applied before the lethal 'index' ischaemic event, sets in motion molecular and cellular mechanisms that increase cardiomyocyte survival to a degree that had not hitherto been seen before. The cardioprotective ischaemic-reperfusion protocol applied at onset of reperfusion, termed 'postconditioning' (Postcon), is also associated with significant cardioprotection that can be applied at the point of reperfusion treatment in the catheterization laboratory or operating room. Both preconditioning and Postcon have been successfully applied to the clinical setting and have been found to reduce infarct size and other attributes of post-ischaemic injury. This review will summarize the physiological preclinical data on preconditioning and Postcon that are relevant to their translation to clinical therapeutics and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available