4.3 Article

FDG-PET is superior to gallium scintigraphy in staging and more sensitive in the follow-up of patients with de novo hodgkin lymphoma: A blinded comparison

Journal

LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 85-92

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1042819031000149430

Keywords

PET; gallium scintigraphy; Hodgkin lymphoma; spleen; staging; relapse

Funding

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA078936] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [CA 78936] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate staging of Hodgkin lymphoma (HD) allows for minimization of therapy and reduction of long-term toxicities. The present study prospectively compares FDG-PET with gallium/SPECT scintigraphy at time of diagnosis and in follow-up of 36 patients with HD. Prior to therapy, whole body FDG-PET and gallium/SPECT were performed. Follow-up scans were obtained after 3 cycles of chemotherapy (n = 22), and at the end of chemotherapy (n = 32). Two nuclear medicine physicians independently interpreted scans in blinded and random order and a consensus was obtained. Baseline scans revealed a greater number of supradiaphragmatic disease sites detected by PET, and 5 patients had splenic involvement on PET not noted by gallium (P = 0.05); 3 patients were upstaged on PET. Midway through therapy, 5 patients had positive PET (4 of whom relapsed), and 3 had positive gallium (1 relapsed). At conclusion of chemotherapy, 8 patients had a positive PET (4 relapsed) and 3 had a positive gallium (2 relapsed). In conclusion, diagnostic PET and gallium are largely concordant, with the exception of unique detection of splenic disease by PET. However, more patients have persistently positive PET at the end of chemotherapy compared with gallium (P = 0.04), although only half of these patients have relapsed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available