4.7 Article

High-mobility group box 1 restores cardiac function after myocardial infarction in transgenic mice

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
Volume 80, Issue 1, Pages 40-46

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvn163

Keywords

HMGB1; cardiac remodelling; myocardial infarction; angiogenesis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan [18590760, 19590804]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Fukuda Foundation for Medical Technology
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18590760, 19590804] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims High-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a nuclear DNA-binding protein and is released from necrotic cells, inducing inflammatory responses and promoting tissue repair and angiogenesis. To test the hypothesis that HMGB1 enhances angiogenesis and restores cardiac function after myocardial infarction (MI), we generated transgenic mice with cardiac-specific overexpression of HMGB1 (HMGB1-Tg) using alpha-myosin heavy chain promoter. Methods and results The left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated in HMGB1-Tg and wild-type littermate (Wt) mice. After coronary artery ligation, HMGB1 was released into circulation from the necrotic cardiomyocytes of HMGB1-overexpressing hearts. The size of MI was smaller in HMGB1-Tg than in Wt mice. Echocardiography and cardiac catheterization demonstrated that cardiac remodelling and dysfunction after MI were prevented in HMGB1-Tg mice compared with Wt mice. Furthermore, the survival rate after MI of HMGB1-Tg mice was higher than that of Wt mice. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that capillary and arteriole formation after MI was enhanced in HMGB1-Tg mice. Conclusion We report the first in vivo evidence that HMGB1 enhances angiogenesis, restores cardiac function, and improves survival after MI. These results may provide a novel therapeutic approach for left ventricular dysfunction after MI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available