4.5 Article

Current levels and distribution of Cs-137 and Pu isotopes in soil on the Kazakhstan territory of the Kazakhstan-Chinese border: Semipalatinsk and Lob Nor nuclear test sites detonation

Journal

JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 261, Issue 3, Pages 533-545

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1023/B:JRNC.0000037093.74415.7e

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More than 100 soil samples were collected from 46 sites along roads and some settlements connecting Alma-Ata to Semipalatinsk City of the Kazakhstan-Chinese border and analyzed for Cs-137 and Pu isotopes (Pu-238, Pu-239 and Pu-240). The mean Cs-137 inventory at each site was within the range of 1,000-3,000 Bq/m(2) for most of the sites. The Pu-239,Pu-240 concentration and its inventories were observed in the wide range of 0.18-2.6 Bq/kg and 28-677 Bq/m(2), respectively. At the most northern sites in the areas studied, higher Pu-239,Pu-240 inventories were found corresponding to the increase of Pu-239,Pu-240 fraction which was not leached by hot digestion with cone. HNO3+H2O2. The Pu-239,Pu-240/Cs-137 activity ratios for the soil samples from the southern areas lie in the narrow range of 0.016-0.039 (most of data being 0.02-0.03), probably indicative of global fallout origin. On the other hand, a little or several higher ratios (0.05 to 0.22) were found for soil samples from the northern areas. These higher ratios demonstrate strongly that there was additional Pu input of local fallout due to the atomic explosions. From Pu-240/Pu-239 atomic ratios measured, contribution of local fallout Pu-239,Pu-240, probably from the SNTS, was found to be higher (60-86%) in the sites around the northern areas than the southern ones. The present data might serve not only as a current baseline information on distribution and contamination levels of the long-lived fallout radionuclides in the Kazakhstan areas of the Kazakhstan-Chinese border, but also as a aid of selection of control area for epidemiological projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available