4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Has the 2004 revision of the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation grading system improved the reproducibility of the diagnosis and grading of cardiac transplant rejection?

Journal

CARDIOVASCULAR PATHOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 198-204

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.carpath.2008.05.003

Keywords

Endomyocardial biopsy; Acute cellular rejection; Cardiac transplant rejection; Grading; Interobserver reproducibility; 2004 ISHLT scale

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We compared the interobserver reproducibility of the 1990 and 2004 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grading system for cardiac rejection. The 2004 ISHLT grading system for cardiac allograft rejection did not improve reproducibility partly due to pathologists' disagreement in diagnosing Grades 1B/1R and 3A/2R rejection. To achieve better reproducibility, better criteria for defining 1B/1R vs. 3A/2R rejection and markers of myocyte injury are needed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available