4.7 Article

Investigating the occurrence of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in the arctic: their atmospheric behaviour and interaction with the seasonal snow pack

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 128, Issue 1-2, Pages 163-175

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2003.08.026

Keywords

contaminants; polar; trends; snow

Ask authors/readers for more resources

POPs in the Arctic are the focus of international concern due to their occurrence and accumulation in Arctic food webs. This paper presents an overview of the major pathways into the Arctic and details contemporary studies that have focused on the occurrence and transfer of POPs between the major Arctic compartments, highlighting areas where there is a lack of quantitative information. The behaviour of these chemicals in the Arctic atmosphere is scrutinised with respect to long-term trends and seasonal behaviour. Subtle differences between the PCBs and OC pesticides are demonstrated and related to sources outside of the Arctic as well as environmental processes within the Arctic. Unlike temperate regions, contaminant fate is strongly affected by the presence of snow and ice. A description of the high Arctic snow pack is given and the physical characteristics that determine chemical fate, namely the specific surface area of snow and wind driven ventilation, are discussed. Using a well-characterised fresh snow event observed at Alert (Canadian high Arctic) [Atmos. Environ. 36(2002) 2767] the flux of gamma-HCH out of the snow is predicted following snow ageing. Under conditions of wind (10 m/s) it is estimated that approximate to75% of the chemical may be re-emitted to the atmosphere within 24 h following snowfall, compared with just approximate to5% under conditions of no wind. The implications of this are raised and areas of further research suggested. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available