4.6 Article

Dietary retinoic acid supplementation stimulates intestinal tumour formation and growth in multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min)/+ mice

Journal

CARCINOGENESIS
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 149-153

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgg176

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemopreventive activity by retinoic acid (RA) has been demonstrated previously in rat colon. The spontaneous tumourigenesis in the Min/+ mouse, which harbours a germline mutation in the tumour suppressor gene adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc), is characterized by inactivation of Apc, nuclear accumulation of beta-catenin and the enhanced expression of specific genes activated by T cell factor (TCF)/beta-catenin signalling. Recently it was reported that beta-catenin interacts with retinoic acid receptor in a retinoid-dependent manner, reducing beta-catenin/TCF regulated transcription. Our hypothesis was therefore that dietary supplementation with all-trans RA may inhibit the Apc-driven tumourigenesis in Min/+ mice. Surprisingly, in two different experiments the results showed that dietary RA significantly stimulated both the formation and growth of small intestinal tumours. In the first experiment Min/+ mice were exposed to 50 mg 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine/kg bodyweight at day 3-6 after birth and then treated with 50 mg/kg dietary RA in 1-3 weeks from the age of 2 weeks. In the second experiment the mice were not treated with carcinogen, and the diet was supplemented with 5 or 10 mg/kg RA from the age of 4 weeks until termination of the experiment at 11 weeks. Immunohistochemical studies revealed no differences in beta-catenin, cyclin D1 or proliferating cell nuclear antigen staining following RA treatment. There was no intestinal toxicity in mice fed 10 mg/kg RA, indicating that the increased tumourigenesis in Min/+ mice is a specific effect of all-trans RA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available