4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Global aspects of C/N interactions determining plant-environment interactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 55, Issue 394, Pages 11-25

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh011

Keywords

agriculture; algae; astrochemistry; carbon; chemical defence; compatible solutes; ecology; evolution; free radical scavenging; nitrogen; UV-B screening

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The atomic C:N ratio in photolithotrophs is a function of their content of nucleic acids, proteins, lipids, polysaccharides, and other organic materials, and varies from about 5 in some protein-rich microalgae to much higher values in macroalgae and in higher plants with relatively more structural and energy storage materials. These differences in C:N ratios among organisms means that there is more N assimilation by photosynthetic organisms in the oceans than on land despite the near equality of global photosynthetic C assimilation rates in the two environments. Aquatic organisms obtain inorganic C and inorganic N from the surrounding water. Terrestrial photolithotrophs obtain inorganic C, dinitrogen (by diazotrophy) and some combined N from the atmosphere, with the remaining combined N coming from the soil. The nitrogen cost of growth (biomass production rate per unit plant N) varies with the C:N ratio and specific growth rate of the organism. The C:N ratio of plants can be increased with no, or minimal, decrease in growth rate by switching from N-containing to N-free solutes involved in, for example, UV-B screening or by reducing the content of particular proteins. The water cost of growth (water lost per unit biomass gain) in terrestrial plants is a function of N supply and of C supply; water cost is lower with higher N and C availability. Water supply is also important in determining denitrification rates on land and on N (and C) fluxes from terrestrial to aquatic systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available