4.2 Article

Spontaneous mutant frequency and mutation spectrum for gene A of Phi X174 grown in E-coli

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 119-127

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/em.20041

Keywords

single burst analysis; mutant spectra; spontaneous mutant frequency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of transgenic targets for measuring mutant frequencies in mammalian tissue requires an estimate of the mutant frequency that results from recovery of the transgene in bacterial recovery systems. In this study, we have determined the spontaneous mutant frequency, estimated the mutation rate, and ascertained the mutation spectrum for gene A of (I)X 174 grown in E. coli strain CQ2 from 156 small independent cultures. The mutant frequency of 12 of the 156 cultures was 17 +/- 1.0 x 10(-6) and the estimated mutation rate per gene replication was 7.4 +/- 2.3 x 10(-6). The mutant frequency and spectrum from E. coli were not significantly different from that of solvent-treated embryonic mouse cells in culture, 19 +/- 0.5 x 10(-6) (Valentine CR et al. [2002]: Environ Mal Mutagen 39:55-68), indicating that those spontaneous mutants were primarily derived from E. coli. The E. coli spectrum was heavily weighted toward two major target sites (hot spots), 4225A-->G (56%) and 421 8G-->A or C (20%). Four new target sites and one new mutational event were recovered by the gene A forward assay. A mutant spectrum from an expanded phage stock was also determined to assess the effects of propagating the virus. This mutant frequency was higher (6 x 10(-4)), contained more double mutants (15% compared to 0.6%), and had a significantly different spectrum from the spectrum for independent cultures (fewer A:T-G:C and G:C C:G changes and more G:C-A:T; P < 0.002). The E. coli mutation spectrum will be useful for determining the origin of gene A mutation in tissues of PhiX174 transgenic mice. Published 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.(dagger)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available