4.6 Article

Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 23-29

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/uog.966

Keywords

gender differences; head circumference; intrauterine growth; ultrasound screening

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Female fetuses, on average, weigh less than male fetuses at all gestational ages. The purpose of this study was to compare female and male fetuses in terms of intrauterine ultrasound growth measurements and to develop gestational-age-related charts based on a computerized perinatal database. Methods This was a retrospective study of unselected women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, who bad a normal scan at 10-14 weeks. Data analysis was performed using measurements obtained from a mixed-race Population of 4234 women, who underwent 5198 ultrasound examinations. The scans were performed by four trained sonographers, according to a standardized protocol. Routine measurements included biparietal diameter (BPD), bead circumference (HQ, abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). The main end-points were sex- and race-specific differences in fetal biometry, which were also used to estimate fetal weight. Results The base-line demographic characteristics and risk factors were comparable in female and male fetuses. Significant differences in fetal BPD, HC, AC and estimated fetal weight, but not FL, were seen between male and female fetuses. Centile charts for each of these variables were constructed for both male and female fetuses. Conclusions This study suggests that small but consistent sex-related differences in prenatal BPD, HC and AC measurements are established by as early as 15 weeks of gestation. The use of sex-specific nomograms may improve the prenatal assessment of fetal growth as well as the diagnosis of structural abnormalities. Copyright (C) 2004 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available