4.6 Article

Exploring the quantitative relationship between the level of MDR1 transcript, protein and function using digoxin as a marker of MDR1-dependent drug efflux activity

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 69-75

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0928-0987(03)00204-5

Keywords

Caco-2; digoxin; drug efflux activity; MDR1; p-glycoprotein; protein abundance; transcript abundance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A limited number of gene expression studies have investigated the quantitative relationships between the amount of transcript, level of protein or activity/function, with disparate conclusions regarding these relationships. Collectively these studies indicate that the relevance of quantitative transcript analysis as a predictor of phenotype has to be evaluated on a gene-by-gene or even a case-by-case basis. The purpose of this study was to define a suitable marker for MDR1-dependent drug efflux, and to quantitatively investigate the relationships between the amount of transcript, protein and drug efflux in the frequently used Caco-2 cell model. The substrate specificity of digoxin, a commonly used marker for MDR1, was investigated using transgenic MDCKII or LLC-PK1 cell lines expressing the efflux proteins MDR1, BCRP and MRP2, since these proteins are localised to the apical part of the enterocyte plasma membrane and exhibit comparatively high transcript levels in the human small intestine. Relationships between levels of transcript, protein and function were investigated quantitatively using real-time RT-PCR, ECL western blot analysis and basolateral-to-apical and apical-to-basolateral efflux ratios. Our results indicate that digoxin is a specific marker for MDR1-dependent drug efflux in the Caco-2 cell drug absorption model and that MDR1 transcript abundance is at least as valid as MDR1 protein abundance as a predictor of MDR1 efflux activity. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available