4.6 Article

Ammonium effects on colonic Cl- secretion: anomalous mole fraction behavior

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00196.2003

Keywords

transepithelial resistance; Na+-K+-2Cl(-)-cotransporter

Funding

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK051630] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK-051630] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A significant amount of ammonium (NH4+) is absorbed by the colon. The nature of NH4+ effects on transport and NH4+ transport itself in colonic epithelium is poorly understood. The goal of this study was to elucidate the effects of NH4+ on cAMP-stimulated Cl- secretion in the colonic cell line T84. In HEPES-buffered solutions, application of basolateral NH4+ resulted in a reduced level of Cl- secretory current. The effect of NH4+ appears to occur by at least three mechanisms: 1) basolateral membrane depolarization, 2) a competitive effect with K+, and 3) a long-term (> 20 min) increase in transepithelial resistance (TER). The competitive effect with K+ exhibits anomalous mole fraction behavior. Transepithelial current relative to that in 10 mM basolateral K+ was inhibited 15% by 10 mM NH4+ alone and by 30% with a mixture of 2 mM K+ and 8 mM NH4+. A mole fraction mix of 2 mM K+:8 mM NH4+ produced a greater inhibition of basolateral membrane K+ current than pure K+ or NH4+ alone. Similar anomalous behavior was also observed for inhibition of bumetanide-sensitive Cl-36(-) uptake, e.g., Na+-K+-2Cl(-)-cotransporter (NKCC-1). No anomalous effect was observed on Na+-K+-ATPase current. Both NKCC-1 and Na+-K+-ATPase activity were elevated in 10 mM NH4+ with respect to 10 mM K+. The effect on TER did not exhibit anomalous mole fraction behavior. The overall effect of basolateral NH4+ on cAMP-stimulated transport is dependent on the [K+](o)/[NH4+](o) ratio at the basolateral membrane, where o is outside of the cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available