4.1 Article

Association between soil type and paratuberculosis in cattle herds

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 10-14

Publisher

AMER VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.10

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective-To determine the association between soil type and paratuberculosis in cattle. Sample Population-Soil samples and test results for paratuberculosis in 92 Indiana cattle herds. Procedure-Testing records from herds in which greater than or equal to 20 cattle were tested for paratuberculosis by use of an ELISA between 1998 and 2002 were identified. Soil type was characterized on the basis of herd location. Clusters of herds with seroprevalence greater than the median seroprevalence were identified. Association between clusters and soil types was estimated by logistic regression, adjusted for herd type (dairy or beef). Results-A spatial cluster of greater than the median seroprevalence was identified in northeast Indiana. Soils with low silt content were associated (odds ratio [OR], 72; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 2.1 to 24.5) with this cluster. Adjusting for herd type did not substantially alter this association (OR, 6.7). Herds located in areas with sandy loam (OR, 6.2; 95% Cl, 1.4 to 27.4) and loam (OR, 3.6; 95% Cl, 1.0 to 13.2) soils were also more likely to be within the cluster of greater than the median seroprevalence. Herds located in areas of silt loam soils were less likely (OR, 0.2; 95% Cl, 0.1 to 0.7) to be included in this cluster. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance-Spatial distribution of herds with greater than the median seroprevalence of paratuberculosis was associated with soil characteristics. Survival of Mycobacterium avium subsp paratuberculosis may be enhanced by silt or sand content in loamy soils. These results may be used to modify paratuberculosis control programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available