4.7 Article

Biogenic controls on the air-water carbon dioxide exchange in the Sundarban mangrove environment, northeast coast of Bay of Bengal, India

Journal

LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 95-101

Publisher

AMER SOC LIMNOLOGY OCEANOGRAPHY
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2004.49.1.0095

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Sundarban mangrove forest (4,264 km(2)) constitutes about 3% of the total area of the world mangrove. We measured diurnal and seasonal variations of air-water CO, exchange in relation to the occurrence of phytoplankton during January-December 2001. Diurnal variations of airflows showed that the minimum and maximum CO, flux of - 16.2 mumol m(-2) h(-1) and 49.9 mumol m(-2) h(-1), respectively, occurred during the higher sea breeze. The average ratio of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN = 13.85 +/- 7.19 mumol L-1) to dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP = 1.23 +/- 0.57 mumol L-1) was 11 +/- 4 and the surface water was undersaturated with respect to dissolved oxygen. The mean value of 0.1 +/- 0.08 for the ratio of phytoplankton production (P) to community respiration (R) indicated that the ecosystem was heterotrophic. The saturation of dissolved carbon dioxide with respect to the atmosphere varied seasonally between 59% and 156%, with minimum levels in postmonsoon and maximum levels in premonsoon/early monsoon (June/July). Out of the 36 genera of diatoms, 1 blue green alga, and 3 dinoflagellates that occurred throughout the year, only 6 reached bloom proportions in postmonsoon, when mangrove water was a sink of atmospheric CO2. Although 59.3% of the emitted CO2 was removed from the atmosphere by biological processes, on an annual basis, the Sundarban mangrove forest supplies 13.8 kg C ha(-1) yr(-1) of CO2 from water surface to the atmosphere. Even though it is important to compare all in and out fluxes, there is no direct link between CO2 emission and the later CO2 removal by biological processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available