4.2 Article

Enhancement of murine IgE antibody detection by IgG removal

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 284, Issue 1-2, Pages 1-6

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2003.08.017

Keywords

IgE antibody detection; IgG depletion; IgE anti-shrimp; IgE anti-peanut

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rationale: Although animal models for the study of allergic reactions are desirable, the use of mice has been hindered by the lack of sufficiently sensitive in vitro immunoglobulin epsilon (IgE) antibody assays. The aim of this study was to enhance IgE antibody measurements by immunoglobulin gamma (IgG) depletion. Methods: Seven- to eight-week-old female mice of four strains (C3H/HeJ, CBA/J, C57BI/6J, and Balb/c) were immunized (20 mice/group) with shrimp or peanut extracts using Al(OH)(3) as adjuvant. Following immunization, animals were sacrificed by exsanguination and the sera of each group pooled. Initial measurements of IgE antibody levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) were relatively low; IgG and IgE reactivity patterns by immunoblot were similar. Thus, sera from shrimp or peanut immunized mice were depleted of IgG (absorbed 3-6 times with immobilized protein G) and then tested for IgE antibody to shrimp or peanut allergen. Results: A 3- to 5-fold increase in IgE antibody reactivity as measured by ELISA was demonstrated when >80-90% of the IgG was removed. This increase in detection of allergen-specific IgE occurred in sera from all mouse strains and to all allergens tested. In addition, reactivity of IgE antibodies to peanut or shrimp allergens by immunoblot increased visually approximately 4- to 10-fold. Conclusions: These studies indicate that allergen-specific IgG antibodies, which may be in more than 100-fold excess to IgE antibodies, interferes with detection of allergen-specific IgE, probably by competitive binding to allergenic epitopes. Substantial depletion of IgG antibodies (>80%) result in a significant increase in the sensitivity of the antibody measurements. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available