4.5 Article

Monitoring leaf nitrogen status in rice with canopy spectral reflectance

Journal

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 135-142

Publisher

AMER SOC AGRONOMY
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.0135

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nondestructive monitoring and diagnosis of plant N status is necessary for precision N management. The present study was conducted to determine if canopy reflectance could be used to evaluate leaf N status in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Ground-based canopy spectral reflectance and N concentration and accumulation in leaves were measured over the entire rice growing season under various treatments of N fertilization, irrigation, and plant population. Analyses were made on the relationships of seasonal canopy spectral reflectance, ratio indices, and normalized difference indices to leaf N concentration and N accumulation in rice under different N treatments. The results showed that at each sampling date, leaf N concentration was negatively related to the reflectance at the green band (560 nm) while positively related to ratio index, with the best correlation at jointing. However, the relationships between leaf N accumulation and reflectance at green band and ratio index were consistent across the whole growth period. The ratio of near infrared (NIR) to green (R-810/R-560) was especially linearly related to total leaf N accumulation, independent of N level and growth stage. Tests of the linear regression model with different field experiment data sets involving different plant densities, N fertilization, and irrigation treatments exhibited good agreement between the predicted and observed values, with an estimation accuracy of 96.69%, root mean square error of 0.7072, and relative error of - 0.0052. These results indicate that the ratio index of NIR to green (R-810/R-560) should be useful for nondestructive monitoring of N status in rice plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available